“How extremely stupid not to have thought of that!” How did I fail to ever consider that female human breasts might serve a similar evolutionary sexual display function as the male peacock's tail? What a fascinating hypothesis! Is it original? If so, it deserves wide circulation.
I mean, it's female intrasexual competition, right? The worse men feel about going after the Hooters lady the better the chances for the lady with the sign.
Of course, she may not be into men at all. I've always had the conspiracy theory a lot of the attempt to make men afraid to talk to women is also lesbians trying to weaken men's position enough that they have a shot at bi women, but maybe I'm totally off base here.
“How extremely stupid not to have thought of that!” How did I fail to ever consider that female human breasts might serve a similar evolutionary sexual display function as the male peacock's tail? What a fascinating hypothesis! Is it original? If so, it deserves wide circulation.
I love your funny, irreverent delivery of the basic facts of sexual selection. Thanks!
You are very welcome :)
"... more upper body strength and muscle mass than women; primarily to fight other men, but also…"
... to open pickle jars ... 😉🙂
Oh, I might steal that!
I mean, it's female intrasexual competition, right? The worse men feel about going after the Hooters lady the better the chances for the lady with the sign.
Of course, she may not be into men at all. I've always had the conspiracy theory a lot of the attempt to make men afraid to talk to women is also lesbians trying to weaken men's position enough that they have a shot at bi women, but maybe I'm totally off base here.