I take it that you're all in for Trump? 👍😉🙂 Rather sympathetic to that idea. ICYMI, more than a few other Substackers, reputable journalists, & biologists are doing likewise or leaning that way:
"But [as a vegetarian] I'd rather eat one of those still-somehow-alive-and-kicking frog legs than vote for Kamala."
"Rachel Levine Must Resign; A case study in politics and ideology overruling science. With children as victims. .... I have to say that the news this week has made me reconsider voting for Kamala Harris. ...."
Trump is -- at best, somewhat sadly -- something of a loose cannon, a bull in a china shop. And many Republicans, like many Democrats, leave a lot to be desired, but at least the Republicans aren't engaged in the castration and sterilization of autistic and dysphoric children. Helens Dale and Joyce argued, more or less reasonably, that transgenderism -- which the Democrats are most responsible for -- is something of a "civilization threatening/ending movement":
I don't believe Trump is at all a loose cannon. He's a real person rather than a stepford candidate.
Helen Dale has stopped engaging with me with no explanation & not yet paid me for an article I wrote for her substack a year ago. Is it still called "not on your team but always fair"? An explanation would be fair.
> "I don't believe Trump is at all a loose cannon. He's a real person rather than a stepford candidate."
"stepford candidate", Manchurian Candidate -- I like that. 🙂 Rather accurate too.
But if maybe not a "loose cannon" then certainly someone with some baggage, a rather flawed character in many ways. Though few of us are perfect, and he may well be "the man of the hour", Horatio at the bridge, Leonidas at the battle of Thermopylae. So to speak.
> " Is it still called 'not on your team but always fair'?"
🙂 Definitely something a serious "misnomer" from another seriously "flawed" character -- stopped clocks & all that. For example, she deleted all of my many comments on her Substack, largely because, I expect, I had "offended" her (many) vanities in more ways than one:
"The 'Spergy' Letter Project; Or, 'True Lies: Helen Is Having An Affair' ..."
"#TrumpVance2024; #DonaldJTrump; #Trump"
I take it that you're all in for Trump? 👍😉🙂 Rather sympathetic to that idea. ICYMI, more than a few other Substackers, reputable journalists, & biologists are doing likewise or leaning that way:
"But [as a vegetarian] I'd rather eat one of those still-somehow-alive-and-kicking frog legs than vote for Kamala."
https://www.andrewgoldheretics.com/p/why-im-off-the-fence-about-trump
"Why I Am Voting for Trump; And am proud to do so"; Heather Heying
https://naturalselections.substack.com/p/why-i-am-voting-for-trump
"Rachel Levine Must Resign; A case study in politics and ideology overruling science. With children as victims. .... I have to say that the news this week has made me reconsider voting for Kamala Harris. ...."
https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/rachel-levine-must-resign
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1C4TviZDerIvuIgFydqqkl6omj-IX-DiM/view?usp=sharing
Trump is -- at best, somewhat sadly -- something of a loose cannon, a bull in a china shop. And many Republicans, like many Democrats, leave a lot to be desired, but at least the Republicans aren't engaged in the castration and sterilization of autistic and dysphoric children. Helens Dale and Joyce argued, more or less reasonably, that transgenderism -- which the Democrats are most responsible for -- is something of a "civilization threatening/ending movement":
https://lawliberty.org/podcast/when-does-sex-matter/
Not sure if that isn't hyperbole or understatement though I tend to the latter.
I don't believe Trump is at all a loose cannon. He's a real person rather than a stepford candidate.
Helen Dale has stopped engaging with me with no explanation & not yet paid me for an article I wrote for her substack a year ago. Is it still called "not on your team but always fair"? An explanation would be fair.
But yes, it's an understatement. It's 100% feminisms doing. As I show here https://paulawright.substack.com/p/the-cure-for-feminism-is-not-more
> "I don't believe Trump is at all a loose cannon. He's a real person rather than a stepford candidate."
"stepford candidate", Manchurian Candidate -- I like that. 🙂 Rather accurate too.
But if maybe not a "loose cannon" then certainly someone with some baggage, a rather flawed character in many ways. Though few of us are perfect, and he may well be "the man of the hour", Horatio at the bridge, Leonidas at the battle of Thermopylae. So to speak.
> " Is it still called 'not on your team but always fair'?"
🙂 Definitely something a serious "misnomer" from another seriously "flawed" character -- stopped clocks & all that. For example, she deleted all of my many comments on her Substack, largely because, I expect, I had "offended" her (many) vanities in more ways than one:
"The 'Spergy' Letter Project; Or, 'True Lies: Helen Is Having An Affair' ..."
https://humanuseofhumanbeings.substack.com/p/the-spergy-letter-project
> "But yes, it's an understatement. It's 100% feminisms doing. As I show here."
👍🙂 Nice to see we're more or less on the same page. Worth a subscription, at least for a month. 🙂